In re Grand Canyon Education, Inc. Securities Litigation
Grand Canyon Education Securities Litigation
Civil Action No. 20-cv-00639-JLH-CJB (D. Del.)

Frequently Asked Questions

 

Expand/Collapse All
  • The Court directed that this Notice be mailed to you because you or someone in your family or an investment account for which you serve as a custodian may have purchased Grand Canyon common stock during the Class Period.  The Court has directed us to send you this Notice because, as a potential Settlement Class Member, you have a right to know about your options before the Court rules on the proposed Settlement.  Additionally, you have the right to understand how this class action lawsuit may generally affect your legal rights.  If the Court approves the Settlement, and the Plan of Allocation (or some other plan of allocation), the Claims Administrator selected by Lead Plaintiffs and approved by the Court will make payments pursuant to the Settlement after any objections and appeals are resolved.

    The purpose of this Notice is to inform you of the existence of this case, that it is a class action, how you might be affected, and how to exclude yourself from the Settlement Class if you wish to do so.  It is also being sent to inform you of the terms of the proposed Settlement, and of a hearing to be held by the Court to consider the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, and the motion by Lead Counsel for attorneys’ fees and Litigation Expenses (the “Settlement Hearing”). The details regarding the Settlement Hearing can be found in the Long Form Notice ¶¶ 61-62, including the date and location of the hearing.

    The issuance of this Notice is not an expression of any opinion by the Court concerning the merits of any claim in the Action, and the Court still has to decide whether to approve the Settlement.  If the Court approves the Settlement and a plan of allocation, then payments to Authorized Claimants will be made after any appeals are resolved and after the completion of all claims processing.  Please be patient, as this process can take some time to complete.

  • Grand Canyon is an educational services company incorporated in Delaware.  Grand Canyon’s common stock trades on the NASDAQ under the ticker symbol “LOPE.”  This Action involves allegations that, during the Class Period (from January 5, 2018 through January 27, 2020), Grand Canyon and the Individual Defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions regarding the Company’s 2018 sale of Grand Canyon University (“GCU”), a for-profit university it owned and operated, to an entity organized as an Arizona nonprofit corporation.  Lead Plaintiffs allege that these misrepresentations and omissions caused the price of Grand Canyon’s common stock to be inflated during the Class Period, and that the price declined when the truth was disclosed through a series of disclosures on November 6 and 7, 2019 and January 28, 2020.

    On May 12, 2020, The City of Hialeah Employees’ Retirement System filed the first of the related class actions in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (the “Court”), alleging violations of the federal securities laws.

    On August 13, 2020, the Court entered an Order appointing Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado, Oakland County Employees’ Retirement System, and Oakland County Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association Trust as Lead Plaintiffs, and approving their selection of Bernstein Litowitz and Barrack, Rodos & Bacine as Lead Counsel.

    On October 20, 2020, Lead Plaintiffs filed the Consolidated Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (“Consolidated Complaint”).  The Consolidated Complaint asserted claims on behalf of all persons and entities who purchased Grand Canyon common stock during the Class Period.  The Consolidated Complaint alleged that Defendants made materially false and misleading statements or omissions regarding Grand Canyon’s sale of GCU to an entity organized as an Arizona nonprofit corporation.  The Consolidated Complaint asserted claims under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and SEC Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b‑5, promulgated thereunder, against all Defendants; and claims under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78t(a), against the Individual Defendants.

    On December 21, 2020, Defendants moved to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint, asserting (among other things) that Lead Plaintiffs failed to sufficiently allege actionable misstatements or omissions, that Defendants acted with scienter, or loss causation.  The motion to dismiss was fully briefed and the Court held oral argument on the motion on May 26, 2021.

    On August 9, 2021, Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke issued a Report and Recommendation recommending the Court grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss and permit Lead Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint within 14 days to correct the deficiencies identified.  Lead Plaintiffs did not seek District Court review of Magistrate Judge Burke’s Report and Recommendation and, on August 23, 2021, the Court adopted the Report and Recommendation.

    Lead Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Consolidated Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the “Complaint”) on January 21, 2022, which contained new allegations meant to address the concerns identified by Magistrate Judge Burke.

    Defendants filed their motion to dismiss the Complaint on March 15, 2022.  The renewed motion to dismiss was fully briefed and oral argument on the motion was held on October 25, 2022.  On February 17, 2023, Magistrate Judge Burke issued a Report and Recommendation to deny Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint.  On March 28, 2023, the Court held oral argument on Defendants’ objections to the Magistrate Judge Burke’s February 17, 2023 Report and Recommendation, after which the Court overruled Defendants’ objections and adopted the Report and Recommendation.

    Discovery in the Action commenced in April 2023.  In response to Lead Plaintiffs’ requests for production of documents, Defendants produced thousands of documents to Lead Plaintiffs.  The Parties subpoenaed more than ten third parties and received additional documents from them.  In addition, the Parties met and conferred and exchanged numerous letters concerning disputed discovery issues over several months.

    The Parties began exploring the possibility of a settlement in the fall of 2023.  The Parties agreed to engage in private mediation and retained Michelle Yoshida of Phillips ADR Enterprises to act as mediator in the Action (the “Mediator”).  On November 14, 2023, counsel for the Parties participated in a full-day mediation session before the Mediator.  In advance of that session, the Parties exchanged and submitted detailed confidential mediation statements to the Mediator.  The session ended without any agreement being reached.

    On January 5, 2024, Lead Plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification and appointment of class representatives and class counsel, which was accompanied by a report from Lead Plaintiffs’ expert on market efficiency and common damages methodologies.

    On February 21, 2024, the Parties participated in a second full-day mediation session before the Mediator.  In advance of the mediation session, the Parties again exchanged and submitted confidential mediation statements to the Mediator.  At the conclusion of this second mediation session, the Mediator made a recommendation that the Action be settled for $25.5 million, which the Parties accepted.

    The agreement’s terms were memorialized in a term sheet executed on February 23, 2024 (the “Term Sheet”).  The Term Sheet set forth, among other things, the Parties’ agreement to settle and release all claims against Defendants and Defendants’ Releasees in the Action in return for a cash payment of $25,500,000 for the benefit of the Settlement Class, subject to certain terms and conditions and the execution of a customary “long form” stipulation and agreement of settlement and related papers.

    On March 25, 2024, the Parties entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the “Stipulation”), which sets forth the terms and conditions of the Settlement.  The Stipulation can be viewed on this website under the 'Important Documents' tab.

    On May 1, 2024, the Court preliminarily approved the Settlement, authorized this Notice to be disseminated to potential Settlement Class Members, and scheduled the Settlement Hearing to consider whether to grant final approval to the Settlement.

  • If you are a member of the Settlement Class, you are subject to the Settlement, unless you timely request to be excluded.  The Settlement Class consists of:

    all persons and entities who purchased Grand Canyon common stock during the period from January 5, 2018 through January 27, 2020, inclusive, and who were damaged thereby.

    Excluded from the Settlement Class are: (i) Defendants; (ii) the Immediate Family Members of any Individual Defendant; (iii) any person who is, or was during the Class Period, an Officer or director of Grand Canyon and any of their Immediate Family Members; (iv) any affiliates or subsidiaries of Grand Canyon; (v) any entity in which any Defendant or any of their Immediate Family Members has or had a controlling interest; and (vi) the legal representatives, heirs, agents, affiliates, successors, or assigns of any such excluded persons and entities.  Also excluded from the Settlement Class are any persons or entities who or which exclude themselves by submitting a request for exclusion that is accepted by the Court in accordance with the requirements set forth in this Notice.  See “What If I Do Not Want To Be A Member Of The Settlement Class?  How Do I Exclude Myself?,” on page 11 of the Notice.

    Please Note:  Receipt of the Notice does not mean that you are a Settlement Class Member or that you will be entitled to receive proceeds from the Settlement.

    If you are a Settlement Class Member and you wish to be eligible to participate in the distribution of proceeds from the Settlement, you are required to submit the Claim Form that is being distributed with the Notice and the required supporting documentation as set forth therein postmarked (or submitted online) no later than September 19, 2024.

  • Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel believe that the claims asserted against Defendants have merit. They recognize, however, the very substantial risks they would face in establishing liability and damages through the Court’s ruling on class certification, summary judgment, pre-trial motions, a trial, and appeals, as well as the length and expense to the Settlement Class of continued proceedings.  The risks of continued litigation concerned each main element of Lead Plaintiffs’ claims.  To start, Lead Plaintiff faced challenges in proving that Defendants made false statements concerning their accounting treatment of Grand Canyon University (“GCU”).  For example, Defendants contended that their outside auditors and the SEC reviewed and approved the Company’s accounting treatment of GCU and that, therefore, their statements regarding Grand Canyon’s separateness or independence from GCU were not false or misleading when made.  Further, Lead Plaintiffs faced challenges in proving scienter—i.e., that Defendants knowingly or recklessly deceived investors.  For example, Defendants argued that their statement that the Department of Education’s delay in approving the transaction was due to “understaffing” was not false based on information provided to them by their advisors. There was a meaningful risk that the Court or jury could find that Defendants lacked scienter on a complete record at summary judgment or trial.

    Lead Plaintiffs faced further risks relating to proof of loss causation and damages.  For example, Defendants argued that the report published by Citron Research on January 28, 2020 (the “Citron Report”), which accounted for the majority of Lead Plaintiffs’ damages, could not serve as a corrective disclosure because it did not reveal any new information to the market.  There was significant risk that Lead Plaintiffs would not be able to demonstrate that the Citron Report relied on new facts in its analysis.  Additionally, there was a significant risk that the Court would find that the Citron Report cannot, as a matter of law, have corrected Defendants’ alleged misrepresentations, and dismiss the second corrective disclosure from the case.  If Defendants had succeeded on their loss causation and damages arguments, the recoverable damages could have been substantially less than the amount provided in the Settlement.

    In light of these and other risks, the amount of the Settlement, and the immediacy of recovery to the Settlement Class, Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel believe that the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class. The Settlement provides a substantial benefit to the Settlement Class, namely $25,500,000 in cash (less the various deductions described in this Notice), as compared to the risk that the claims in the Action would produce a smaller recovery, or no recovery at all, after further proceedings on Lead Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and likely summary judgment motions, trial, and appeals, possibly years in the future.

    Defendants have denied the claims asserted against them in the Action and deny that the Settlement Class was harmed or suffered any damages as a result of the conduct alleged in the Action.  Defendants have agreed to the Settlement solely to eliminate the burden and expense of continued litigation.  Accordingly, the Settlement may not be construed as an admission of any wrongdoing by Defendants.

  • If there were no Settlement and Lead Plaintiffs failed to establish any essential legal or factual element of their claims against Defendants, neither Lead Plaintiffs nor the other members of the Settlement Class would recover anything from Defendants.  Also, if Defendants were successful in proving any of their defenses, either at summary judgment, at trial, or on appeal, the Settlement Class could recover less than the amount provided in the Settlement, or nothing at all.

  • As a Settlement Class Member, you are represented by Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel, unless you enter an appearance through counsel of your own choice at your own expense.  You are not required to retain your own counsel, but if you choose to do so, such counsel must file a notice of appearance on your behalf and must serve copies of his or her appearance on the attorneys listed in the section entitled, “When And Where Will The Court Decide Whether To Approve The Settlement?,” on page 12 of the Notice.

    If you are a Settlement Class Member and do not wish to remain a Settlement Class Member, you may exclude yourself from the Settlement Class by following the instructions in the section entitled, “What If I Do Not Want To Be A Member Of The Settlement Class?  How Do I Exclude Myself?,” on page 11 of the Notice.

    If you are a Settlement Class Member and you wish to object to the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or Lead Counsel’s application for attorneys’ fees and Litigation Expenses, and if you do not exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you may present your objections by following the instructions in the section entitled, “When And Where Will The Court Decide Whether To Approve The Settlement?,” on page 12 of the Notice.

    If you are a Settlement Class Member and you do not exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you will be bound by any orders issued by the Court.  If the Settlement is approved, the Court will enter a judgment (the “Judgment”).  The Judgment will dismiss with prejudice the claims against Defendants and will provide that, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, Lead Plaintiffs and each of the other Settlement Class Members, on behalf of themselves, and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns, in their capacities as such, will have fully, finally, and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved, relinquished, waived, and discharged each and every Released Plaintiffs’ Claim (as defined below) against Defendants and the other Defendants’ Releasees (as defined below), and shall forever be barred and enjoined from prosecuting any or all of the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against any of the Defendants’ Releasees.

    “Released Plaintiffs’ Claims” means any and all claims and causes of action of every nature and description, whether arising under federal, state, common, or foreign law, including known claims and Unknown Claims, that (i) Lead Plaintiffs or any other member of the Settlement Class asserted in the Complaint or could have asserted in any other forum that arise out of or are based upon the allegations, transactions, facts, matters or occurrences, representations, or omissions involved, set forth, or referred to in the Complaint and (ii) relate to the purchase of Grand Canyon common stock during the Class Period.  This release does not cover, include, or release (i) any ERISA claims, (ii) any shareholder derivative claims asserted on behalf of Grand Canyon; (iii) any claims by any governmental entity that arise out of any governmental investigation of Defendants relating to the conduct alleged in the Action; or (iv) any claims relating to the enforcement of the Settlement.

    “Defendants’ Releasees” means Defendants and their current and former parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, officers, directors, agents, successors, predecessors, assigns, assignees, partnerships, partners, trustees, trusts, employees, Immediate Family Members, insurers, reinsurers, and attorneys.

    “Unknown Claims” means any Released Plaintiffs’ Claims which any of the Lead Plaintiffs or any other Settlement Class Member does not know or suspect to exist in his, her, or its favor at the time of the release of such claims, and any Released Defendants’ Claims which any Defendant does not know or suspect to exist in his or its favor at the time of the release of such claims, which, if known by him, her or it, might have affected his, her or its decision(s) with respect to this Settlement.  With respect to any and all Released Claims, the Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants shall expressly waive, and each of the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have waived, and by operation of the Judgment shall have expressly waived, any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law or foreign law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to California Civil Code §1542, which provides:

    A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release and that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party.

    Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants acknowledge, and each of the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed by operation of law to have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and a key element of the Settlement.

    The Judgment will also provide that, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, Defendants, on behalf of themselves, and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns, in their capacities as such, will have fully, finally, and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved, relinquished, waived, and discharged each and every Released Defendants’ Claim (as defined below) against Lead Plaintiffs and the other Plaintiffs’ Releasees (as defined below), and shall forever be barred and enjoined from prosecuting any or all of the Released Defendants’ Claims against any of the Plaintiffs’ Releasees.

    “Released Defendants’ Claims” means any and all claims and causes of action of every nature and description, whether arising under federal, state, common, or foreign law, including known claims and Unknown Claims, whether arising under federal, state, common, or foreign law, that arise out of or relate in any way to the institution, prosecution, or settlement of the claims against Defendants in the Action.  This release does not cover, include, or release (i) claims relating to the enforcement of this Stipulation or the Settlement; or (ii) any claims against any person or entity who or which submits a request for exclusion that is accepted by the Court.

    “Plaintiffs’ Releasees” means Lead Plaintiffs, all other plaintiffs in the Action, and all other Settlement Class Members, and their respective current and former parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, officers, directors, agents, successors, predecessors, assigns, assignees, partnerships, partners, trustees, trusts, employees, Immediate Family Members, insurers, reinsurers, and attorneys.

  • To be eligible for a payment from the Settlement, you must be a member of the Settlement Class and you must timely complete and return the Claim Form with adequate supporting documentation postmarked (if mailed), or submitted online at through this website under the 'File A Claim' tab, no later than September 19, 2024.  A Claim Form is included with the Notice, or you may obtain one through this website.  You may also request that a Claim Form be mailed to you by calling the Claims Administrator toll-free at 1-855-208-4129 or by emailing the Claims Administrator at info@GrandCanyonSecuritiesLitigation.com.  Please retain all records of your ownership of and transactions in Grand Canyon common stock, as they will be needed to document your Claim.  The Parties and Claims Administrator do not have information about your transactions in Grand Canyon common stock.

    If you request exclusion from the Settlement Class or do not submit a timely and valid Claim Form, you will not be eligible to share in the Net Settlement Fund.

  • At this time, it is not possible to make any determination as to how much any individual Settlement Class Member may receive from the Settlement.

    Pursuant to the Settlement, Defendants have agreed to cause $25,500,000 in cash (the “Settlement Amount”) to be paid into an escrow account.  The Settlement Amount plus any interest earned thereon is referred to as the “Settlement Fund.”  If the Settlement is approved by the Court and the Effective Date occurs, the “Net Settlement Fund” (that is, the Settlement Fund less (a) all federal, state and/or local taxes on any income earned by the Settlement Fund and the reasonable costs incurred in connection with determining the amount of and paying taxes owed by the Settlement Fund (including reasonable expenses of tax attorneys and accountants); (b) the costs and expenses incurred in connection with providing notice to Settlement Class Members and administering the Settlement on behalf of Settlement Class Members; (c) any attorneys’ fees and Litigation Expenses awarded by the Court; and (d) any other costs or fees approved by the Court) will be distributed to Settlement Class Members who submit valid Claim Forms, in accordance with the proposed Plan of Allocation or such other plan of allocation as the Court may approve.

    The Net Settlement Fund will not be distributed unless and until the Court has approved the Settlement and a plan of allocation, and the time for any petition for rehearing, appeal or review, whether by certiorari or otherwise, has expired.

    Neither Defendants nor any other person or entity that paid any portion of the Settlement Amount on their behalf are entitled to get back any portion of the Settlement Fund once the Court’s order or judgment approving the Settlement becomes Final.  Defendants shall not have any liability, obligation, or responsibility for the administration of the Settlement, the disbursement of the Net Settlement Fund, or the plan of allocation.

    Approval of the Settlement is independent from approval of a plan of allocation.  Any determination with respect to a plan of allocation will not affect the Settlement, if approved.

    Unless the Court otherwise orders, any Settlement Class Member who fails to submit a Claim Form postmarked (or submitted online) on or before September 19, 2024 shall be fully and forever barred from receiving payments pursuant to the Settlement but will in all other respects remain a Settlement Class Member and be subject to the provisions of the Stipulation, including the terms of any Judgment entered and the releases given.  This means that each Settlement Class Member releases the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against the Defendants’ Releasees and will be enjoined and prohibited from filing, prosecuting, or pursuing any of the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against any of the Defendants’ Releasees whether or not such Settlement Class Member submits a Claim Form.

    Participants in and beneficiaries of any employee retirement and/or benefit plan covered by ERISA (“ERISA Plan”) should NOT include any information relating to shares of Grand Canyon common stock purchased through the ERISA Plan in any Claim Form they submit in this Action.  They should include ONLY shares of Grand Canyon common stock purchased during the Class Period outside of an ERISA Plan.  Claims based on any ERISA Plan’s purchases of Grand Canyon common stock during the Class Period may be made by the plan’s trustees.

    The Court has reserved jurisdiction to allow, disallow, or adjust on equitable grounds the Claim of any Settlement Class Member.

    Each Claimant shall be deemed to have submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court with respect to his, her or its Claim Form.

    Only Settlement Class Members or persons authorized to submit a claim on their behalf will be eligible to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund.  Persons and entities that are excluded from the Settlement Class by definition or that exclude themselves from the Settlement Class pursuant to request will not be eligible to receive a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund and should not submit Claim Forms.  The only security that is included in the Settlement is Grand Canyon common stock.

    Appendix A to the Notice sets forth the Plan of Allocation for allocating the Net Settlement Fund among Authorized Claimants, as proposed by Lead Plaintiffs.  At the Settlement Hearing, Lead Plaintiffs will request that the Court approve the Plan of Allocation.  The Court may modify the Plan of Allocation, or approve a different plan of allocation, without further notice to the Settlement Class.

  • Plaintiffs’ Counsel have not received any payment for their services in pursuing claims against the Defendants on behalf of the Settlement Class, nor have Plaintiffs’ Counsel been reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses.  Before final approval of the Settlement, Lead Counsel will apply to the Court for an award of attorneys’ fees for all Plaintiffs’ Counsel in an amount not to exceed 23% of the Settlement Fund.  At the same time, Lead Counsel also intend to apply for payment of Litigation Expenses in an amount not to exceed $600,000, which may include an application for reimbursement of the reasonable costs and expenses incurred by Lead Plaintiffs directly related to their representation of the Settlement Class, pursuant to the PSLRA.  The Court will determine the amount of any award of attorneys’ fees or Litigation Expenses.  Such sums as may be approved by the Court will be paid from the Settlement Fund.  Settlement Class Members are not personally liable for any such fees or expenses.

  • Each Settlement Class Member will be bound by all determinations and judgments in this lawsuit, whether favorable or unfavorable, unless such person or entity mails or delivers a written Request for Exclusion from the Settlement Class, addressed to In re Grand Canyon Education, Inc. Securities Litigation, EXCLUSIONS, c/o JND Legal Administration, P.O. Box 91065, Seattle, WA 98111.  The Request for Exclusion must be received no later than August 1, 2024.  You will not be able to exclude yourself from the Settlement Class after that date. Each Request for Exclusion must (i) state the name, address, and telephone number of the person or entity requesting exclusion, and in the case of entities, the name and telephone number of the appropriate contact person; (ii) state that such person or entity “requests exclusion from the Settlement Class in In re Grand Canyon Education, Inc. Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 20-639-JLH-CJB”; (iii) state the number of shares of Grand Canyon common stock that the person or entity requesting exclusion (A) owned as of the opening of trading on January 5, 2018 and (B) purchased/acquired and/or sold from January 5, 2018 through January 27, 2020, inclusive, as well as the date, number of shares, and prices of each such purchase/acquisition and sale; and (iv) be signed by the person or entity requesting exclusion or an authorized representative.  A Request for Exclusion shall not be effective unless it provides all the information called for in this paragraph and is received within the time stated above, or is otherwise accepted by the Court.

    If you do not want to be part of the Settlement Class, you must follow these instructions for exclusion even if you have pending, or later file, another lawsuit, arbitration, or other proceeding relating to any Released Plaintiffs’ Claim against any of the Defendants’ Releasees.

    If you ask to be excluded from the Settlement Class, you will not be eligible to receive any payment out of the Net Settlement Fund.

    Defendants have the right to terminate the Settlement if valid requests for exclusion are received from persons and entities entitled to be members of the Settlement Class in an amount that exceeds an amount agreed to by Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants.

  • Settlement Class Members do not need to attend the Settlement Hearing.  The Court will consider any submission made in accordance with the provisions below even if a Settlement Class Member does not attend the hearing.  You can participate in the Settlement without attending the Settlement Hearing.

    Please Note:  The date and time of the Settlement Hearing may change without further written notice to the Settlement Class.  The Court may decide to allow Settlement Class Members to appear at the hearing by phone, without further written notice to the Settlement Class.  In order to determine whether the date and time of the Settlement Hearing have changed, or whether Settlement Class Members may participate by phone or video, it is important that you monitor the Court’s docket and this website, before making any plans to attend the Settlement Hearing.  Any updates regarding the Settlement Hearing, including any changes to the date or time of the hearing or updates regarding in-person or remote appearances at the hearing, will be posted to this website.  If the Court allows Settlement Class Members to participate in the Settlement Hearing by telephone or video conference, the information for accessing the telephone or video conference will be posted to this website.

    The Settlement Hearing will be held on August 22, 2024 at 11:00 a.m., before the Honorable Christopher J. Burke of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, in Courtroom 2A of the J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 844 North King Street, Wilmington, DE 19801.  At the Settlement Hearing, the Court will consider: (a) whether the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Settlement Class, and should be finally approved; (b) whether a Judgment substantially in the form attached as Exhibit B to the Stipulation should be entered dismissing the Action with prejudice against Defendants; (c) whether the Settlement Class should be certified for purposes of the Settlement; (d) whether the proposed Plan of Allocation for the proceeds of the Settlement is fair and reasonable and should be approved; (e) whether the motion by Lead Counsel for attorneys’ fees and Litigation Expenses should be approved; and (f) other matters that may properly be brought before the Court in connection with the Settlement.  The Court reserves the right to approve the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, Lead Counsel’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and Litigation Expenses, and/or any other matter related to the Settlement at or after the Settlement Hearing without further notice to the members of the Settlement Class.

    Any Settlement Class Member that does not request exclusion may object to the Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, or Lead Counsel’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and Litigation Expenses.  Objections must be in writing.  You must file any written objection, together with copies of all other papers and briefs supporting the objection, electronically with the Court or by letter mailed to the Clerk’s Office at the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, at the address set forth below on or before August 1, 2024.  You must also serve the papers on Lead Counsel and on Defendants’ Counsel at the addresses set forth below so that the papers are received on or before August 1, 2024.

    Clerk's Office

    United States District Court
    District of Delaware
    Clerk of the Court
    844 North King Street
    Wilmington, DE 19801

    Lead Counsel

    Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossman LLP
    Katherine M. Sinderson
    1251 Avenue of the Americas, 44th Floor
    New York, NY 10020

    and

    Barrack, Rodos & Bacine
    Jeffrey W. Golan
    330 Two Commerce Square
    2001 Market Street
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    Defendants' Counsel

    Alston & Bird LLP
    John L. Latham
    Cara M. Peterman
    Timothy J. Fitzmaurice
    One Atlantic Center
    1201 West Peachtree Street, Suite 4900
    Atlanta, GA 30309-3424

    and

    DLA Piper LLP (US)
    Ronald N. Brown, III
    Peter H. Kyle
    1201 North Market Street, Suite 2100
    Wilmington, DE 19801

    Any objection must include (a) the name of this proceeding, In re Grand Canyon Education, Inc. Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 20-639-JLH-CJB; (b) the objector’s full name, current address, email address (if applicable), and telephone number; (c) the objector’s signature; (d) a statement providing the specific reasons for the objection, including a detailed statement of the specific legal and factual basis for each and every objection and whether the objection applies only to the objector, to a specific subset of the Settlement Class, or to the entire Settlement Class; and (e) documents sufficient to prove membership in the Settlement Class, including documents showing the number of shares of Grand Canyon common stock that the objecting Settlement Class Member purchased/acquired and/or sold from January 5, 2018 through January 27, 2020, inclusive, as well as the date, number of shares, and prices of each such purchase/acquisition and sale.  The documentation establishing membership in the Settlement Class must consist of copies of brokerage confirmation slips or monthly brokerage account statements, or an authorized statement from the objector’s broker containing the transactional and holding information found in a broker confirmation slip or account statement.

    You may not object to the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or Lead Counsel’s motion for attorneys’ fees and Litigation Expenses if you exclude yourself from the Settlement Class or if you are not a member of the Settlement Class.

    You may file a written objection without having to appear at the Settlement Hearing.  You may not, however, appear at the Settlement Hearing to present your objection unless you first file and serve a written objection in accordance with the procedures described above, unless the Court orders otherwise.

    If you wish to be heard orally at the hearing in opposition to the approval of the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or Lead Counsel’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and Litigation Expenses, and if you timely file and serve a written objection as described above, you must also file a notice of appearance with the Clerk’s Office so that it is received on or before August 1, 2024.  Such persons may be heard orally at the discretion of the Court.  Objectors who enter an appearance and desire to present evidence at the Settlement Hearing in support of their objection must include in their written objection or notice of appearance the identity of any witnesses they may call to testify and any exhibits they intend to introduce into evidence at the hearing.

    You are not required to hire an attorney to represent you in making written objections or in appearing at the Settlement Hearing.  However, if you decide to hire an attorney, it will be at your own expense, and that attorney must file a notice of appearance with the Court so that the notice is received on or before August 1, 2024.

    The Settlement Hearing may be adjourned by the Court without further written notice to the Settlement Class, other than a posting of the adjournment on the this website.  If you plan to attend the Settlement Hearing, you should confirm the date and time with Lead Counsel.

    Unless the Court orders otherwise, any Settlement Class Member who does not object in the manner described above will be deemed to have waived any objection and shall be forever foreclosed from making any objection to the proposed Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation or Lead Counsel’s motion for attorneys’ fees and Litigation Expenses.  Settlement Class Members do not need to appear at the Settlement Hearing or take any other action to indicate their approval.

  • If you purchased Grand Canyon common stock from January 5, 2018 through January 27, 2020, inclusive, for the beneficial interest of persons or organizations other than yourself, you must either (a) within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of this Notice, request from the Claims Administrator sufficient copies of the Notice and Claim Form (the “Notice Packet”) to forward to all such beneficial owners and within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of those Notice Packets forward them to all such beneficial owners; or (b) within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of this Notice, provide a list of the names and addresses of all such beneficial owners to In re Grand Canyon Education, Inc. Securities Litigation, c/o JND Legal Administration, P.O. Box 91065, Seattle, WA 98111.  If you choose the second option, the Claims Administrator will send a copy of the Notice and the Claim Form to the beneficial owners.  Upon full compliance with these directions, such nominees may seek payment of their reasonable expenses actually incurred, by providing the Claims Administrator with proper documentation supporting the expenses for which reimbursement is sought.  Copies of this Notice and the Claim Form may also be obtained from this website, or by calling the Claims Administrator toll-free at 1-855-208-4129.

  • This Notice contains only a summary of the terms of the proposed Settlement.  For more detailed information about the matters involved in this Action, you are referred to the papers on file in the Action, including the Stipulation, which may be reviewed by accessing the Court docket in this case through the Court’s Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system or by visiting the office of the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 844 North King Street, Wilmington, DE 19801.  Additionally, copies of the Stipulation and any related orders entered by the Court are posted on this website.

    All inquiries concerning this Notice and the Claim Form should be directed to:

    In re Grand Canyon Education, Inc. Securities Litigation
    c/o JND Legal Administration
    P.O. Box 91065
    Seattle, WA 98111
    855-208-4129
    GrandCanyonSecuritiesLitigation.com

    or

    Katherine M Sinderson
    Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossman LLP
    1251 Avenue of the Americas,
    44th Floor
    New York, NY 10020
    800-380-8496
    settlements@blbglaw.com

    Barrack, Rodos & Bacine
    Jeffrey W. Golan
    330 Two Commerce Square
    2001 Market Street
    Philadelphia, PA 19103
    877-386-3304
    settlements@barrack.com

For More Information

Visit this website often to get the most up-to-date information.

Mail
In re Grand Canyon Education, Inc. Securities Litigation
c/o JND Legal Administration
PO Box 91065
Seattle, WA 98111